Oskeim Sports’ Free College Football Preview: Toledo at Ball State

Oct 2, 2015

ball state

Head coach Pete Lembo has done a tremendous job since arriving in Muncie in 2011, leading Ball State to back-to-back 8-plus win seasons in 2012 and 2013. Now, Lembo returns eighteen starters, including veteran offensive and defensive lines that will help the Cardinals reach postseason play in 2015.

Ball State’s offense is led by quarterback Riley Neal, who has excellent pocket presence and is not susceptible to getting sacked or making mistakes (59.8% completion rate; zero sacks).  The Cardinals have had success running the ball behind a veteran offensive line that returns 1-2 career starts and all five starters from 2014.

Through the first four games of the 2015 campaign, Ball State is averaging 232 rushing yards at 5.6 yards per carry against teams that would combine to allow 5.3 yards per rush play to mediocre offensive squads. The Cardinals’ ground attack will certainly be challenged by an elite Toledo front seven that is yielding 99 rushing yards at 2.8 yards per carry to a group of running backs that would combine to average 4.0 yards per carry.

I expect Ball State offensive coordinator Joey Lynch to emphasize more of an aerial attack to exploit a suspect Toledo secondary that recently lost cornerback Cameron Cole. The Rockets’ defensive backfield is allowing 303 pass yards per game at 6.9 yards per pass play so they are certainly susceptible through the air. Overall, I give Toledo a 0.5 yards per play advantage defensively over the Cardinals’ mediocre attack.

Toledo’s offense has been extremely disappointing to date, averaging 4.0 yards per rush attempt, 5.8 yards per pass attempt and 5.0 yards per play against teams that would combine to allow 4.3 yards per rush play, 7.0 yards per pass play and 5.6 yards per play. The genesis of Toledo’s offensive struggles is its offensive line, which lost 162 career starts and only welcomed back three career starts for 2015. The loss of both MAC Player of the Year Greg Mancz and 1st team All-MAC Chase Nelson left significant holes in the Rockets’ offensive line.

Meanwhile, Ball State has three starters back on its defensive line, including four of the unit’s top five tacklers. Defensive coordinator Kevin Kelly also welcomes back six of his top seven linebackers from last year, fielding the most experienced linebacking corp. in the MAC. While Ball State’s defense has been mediocre at best this season (6.3 yards per play to teams that would combine to average 6.3 yards per play), that is good enough to limit a pathetic Toledo attack that is 0.6 yards per play worse than average.

We can expect a heavy dose of star running back Kareem Hunt (if he plays; listed as questionable) because the Rockets have no chance of success throwing the ball against a very good Ball State secondary that is 0.5 yards per pass play better than average (7.6 yards per pass play to teams that would combine to average 8.1 yards per pass attempt). Hunt has been nursing a hamstring injury, and Toledo head coach Matt Campbell said on September 28 regarding Hunt’s availability to play against Ball State that “we’re going to have to make a really smart decision because I don’t want this to nag.”

Reports from Toledo indicate that Hunt practiced on Wednesday and is “closer to returning to action then he had been,” but the 225-pound back is currently listed as “questionable” for Saturday’s game against the Cardinals. Regardless, Ball State should have success slowing down the Rockets’ anemic attack even if Hunt plays (he won’t bee 100%).

From a technical standpoint, Ball State is 11-4 ATS in its last fifteen October games and 5-2 ATS in its last seven games versus teams with a winning record, whereas the Rockets are 1-4 ATS in their last five October games and 2-8 ATS in their last ten meetings with Ball State (2-5 in Muncie).

Finally, don’t been fouled by Toledo’s perfect 3-0 record as the Rockets have been outgained by an average of 102 yards per game this season! Grab the generous points and invest with confidence.